Blowback

Your chance to vent in a private e-mail.  Unless I’m off on an expedition of some kind, I will access the e-mail within 24 hours.

4 Responses to Blowback

  1. Cy Berlowitz says:

    Howard, I’m trying to figure out when MBS have the wind at their backs. Am I correct in thinking that the wider the spread between the 10-year bond and the 90-day T-Bill the better it is for MBS?

    Best,

    Cy

    • hhill51 says:

      Cy —
      You are correct that the way we used to look at mortgages was that the 10-year Treasury determined the mortgage rate, and the 3-month Treasury was a good proxy for financing rates. (Pre-1993) That made the Bills/Notes spread the one to watch for the MBS carry trade.
      In the 90’s things shifted. LIBOR became the determining rate for almost all debt, and the effective life of mortgages shifted lower due to introduction of ARMs, hybrid ARMs and increasing popularity of 15 year mortgages. Today we might look at the 5 year or 7 year as the proxy for mortgage rates, and 3 month LIBOR as the proxy for repo.
      You could also simply look at the average conventional fixed rate, published by Freddie Mac every Thursday evening, and also look at the 1-yr ARM and 5-1 hybrid ARM rates to determine what new money invested in MBS can make on a leveraged basis.
      Here’s the bloomberg page that has the mortgage rates and LIBOR.
      Here’s how I would do it. First, you need to subtract out the servicing cost from the mortgage rate (50 BP’s is conservative), so a 4.75% fixed rate mortgage with 35 BP’s 3-mon L translates into 425 – 35, or 390 basis points of “raw” spread. Figure half of that disappears for robust hedging, and a third of it for being partially hedged. These days, all the amREITs hedge at least partially, so they are capturing anywhere from 200 to 250 basis points of spread after hedging.
      At 6-1 leverage, that would be 12% to 15% per dollar of capital in carry profits, plus the underlying mortgage yield of 4.25%. Theoretically, then, a fully fixed rate amREIT that partially hedges could earn 19.25% before costs on each dollar of equity capital.
      Figure 100 basis points of expenses for a large REIT (over $1 billion capital) and up to 200 basis points for a smaller REIT with $500 million or less in capital. That takes the ROE down to 17.25% to 18.25%. Then you need to adjust for the premium or discount to book. A stock trading at 1.1 times book would give an expected dividend yield ranging from 15.5% to 16.9%.
      Running the same numbers with ARMs, fully hedged, might give you net of 200 basis points on the carry. [Note: 1-year ARMs are much cheaper to hedge, so I would use 200 BP’s net for both.] At 6-1 leverage again, that makes 1200 basis points, or 12% carry profits. Add in the 3.75% mortgage rate less 50 BP’s for servicing, and you have 15.25% raw return on capital. Subtract 100 to 200 basis points for expenses of the REIT, and you get ROE of 12.25% to 13.25%. For ANH I would assume 125 basis points of costs, since it has about $900 million in capital. If it’s trading to a 0.9x discount to book value like ANH, divide by 0.9 to get expected investor yield of 1300/0.9, or 14.41% for new money they are putting to work today.
      I just checked their website for presentations, and one dated June 2nd this year (see slide 4) is pretty much in line with my “guesstimates”.

  2. Richard McDaniel says:

    Howard,

    First of all thanks for your musings and insights. I have recently discovered your blog. I was following the CIM message board on Yahoo and followed the link to you. I am retired and have a lot of time on my hands now that the weather is turning cold. I have read almost all of the posts on your blog. We seem to see the world and the political reality through the same lenses. It is so refreshing to know that someone else gets it. I have a lot of very smart and educated friends who just don’t have a clue, especially when it comes to the processed oats the republicans are handing out. Of course the democrats have shown their lack of leadership skills and understanding as well. The two largest special interest groups in Washington are the DNC and the RNC. We so much need an alternative. I am sympathetic with the angst of the tea party, but their perspective misses the point and their anger is misdirected.

    In one of your posts you indicated that the Yahoo Message Boards were greatly lacking. I concur. I monitor a number of the REIT related boards, as well as, some of the tech stock boards. Part of the time I am amused, the other part I am fearful of, and/or bored with, the kinds of people that show up. Are there any alterative boards that you monitor in the REIT and tech areas that you could share with me? I don’t post very often. I am a great listener and offer perspectives only when there seems to be a gaping hole that needs to be filled, in my opinion.

    Rich

    • hhill51 says:

      Hey, Rich
      If you don’t know about Valueforum, you probably should. I think it’s up to $200 a year or so. You won’t care for the politics, but most of it stays in the Coffee Shop, the designated area for off=topic stuff.
      .
      The link is on the right hand side of the main page. You can get a 3-day pass for just a few dollars and check it out.
      hh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: