New Rule

August 31, 2010

I’ve been basically doing this, but now I’m going to formally announce it as policy.

A couple of times I’ve described a stock by its sector or subsector, and I’ve been asked for the name.  I didn’t feel comfortable mentioning them when they were very small caps, illiquid, or both.

Now I’ve hit on an easy formulation.  If my personal holdings in a stock I’ve invested in amounts to more than half the average daily volume, I won’t mention the name of the stock.

I shouldn’t punish myself by pre-announcing an exit if decide to sell, nor should I put any reader at big unexplained risk if they are in the stock and see it declining in price as I lighten up, or whatever.

hh

Advertisements

Fiat Money

August 31, 2010

No, I’m not talking about the $15K you’ll shell out at your Chrysler dealer to buy a Mexican-made Son of Mini.

[The Cinquecento is designed by the same guy that did the 2002 Mini re-introduction, so I’m not kidding when I say it’s the “Son of.”]

I’m talking about a reader comment on the Correlation Curse post.  Trent wrote the following:

It could be helpful to express the article in terms of purchasing power of bullion vs fiat money; Fiat dollars will lose purchasing power as they are created without limit by government.  Bullion may lose some purchasing power relative to things you want to get, but it’s likely to be the ‘cash’ demanded preferentially over fiat for exchange for goods and services– Unless you are talking about returning to a barter economy.  All bets off in that case!

Read the rest of this entry »


It’s Still Analog

August 30, 2010

The comments on the last post, already one of the all-time most viewed, have been intriguing.

It seems most people who commented have a binary view of the future.

While I was talking about a financial panic and forced de-levering, a lot of my readers jumped right into TEOTWAWKI (Apocalypse Right Now).  See my post on Pet Peeves to see why there won’t be plentiful 55-gallon drums with nice pieces of wood planking burning in them.

Read on to see why I only have a few percentage points of my investment money in gold, and that’s in stock in development-stage companies that will have big leverage to the price of gold once in production.  For comparison purposes, I have more than three times that much in development pharma companies that are in human testing stages.  (Have you thought about pharamceuticals as a potential store of portable wealth for the post-collapse?)

Read the rest of this entry »


Correlation Curse

August 28, 2010

You often hear about investing for diversity.  You also hear that precious metals, soft commodities, emerging market stocks, US Treasuries (or rare stamps, timber lands, or whatever) are good investments because they rally in different markets than ordinary stocks.

During the good times, that’s true, for all those alternatives.  During bad times, it’s mostly true.

During really bad times, it’s not true.

Read the rest of this entry »


Calling a Top

August 23, 2010

I’m calling a top in bonds in the 10-year and higher maturities.

In too soon, of course, but I did buy some inverse T-bond ETFs today.  Not convinced at all that the rates will start climbing from here (my commitment almost guarantees they keep the bullish trend a bit longer).

Still, I bought some TBT and a bit of TMV today.  I wrote September 32 calls against the TBT, which proceeded down soon after I bought.

hh

PS after the break

Read the rest of this entry »


Meaningless Statistic

August 20, 2010

Forget housing starts.  Unless you’re a homebuilder or lumber supplier, they can’t mean much about the economy these days.

I suppose there is some small fraction of people who will pay twice as much to get that new house smell, though I think it’s probably VOC’s gassing out and not very healthy.  Or is it having just the right faucets in the master bath?  Really?

Read the rest of this entry »


Charlie Brown

August 19, 2010

I just tried to kick an attractive amREIT football, and whiffed.

I was away from my desk when a very minor player (NYMT) was whacked down by a hefty 17 cents from a $6.28 price yesterday.  That was the price my friend and Board Member Dan Osborne paid for 10K shares last week.  It’s also near the price where I added recently.  I hadn’t mentioned it here because of illiquidity and low market cap, so I didn’t feel right about talking about it if you can’t easily buy or sell at a reasonable piece.

Read the rest of this entry »